Arguments against gay marriage

Gay Marriage Legalized by US Supreme Court On Apr. 28, , the US Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Obergefell v. Hodges about whether or not gay marriage is a right guaranteed by the US Constitution, and whether or not gay marriages performed in states where it has been legalized must be recognized in states that ban the practice. [] On June 26, , the US Supreme Court ruled An Argument Against Same-Sex Marriage: An Interview with Rick Santorum The debate over same-sex marriage in the United States is a contentious one, and advocates on both sides continue to work hard to make their voices heard.

Why do opponents of same-sex marriage really oppose it? A UCLA psychology study published online today in the journal Psychological Science concludes that many people believe gay men and women are more sexually promiscuous than heterosexuals, which they may fear could threaten their own marriages and their way of life. “Many people who oppose same-sex marriage are uncomfortable with casual.

Several states have adopted laws authorizing same-sex marriage, either after judicial intervention or by legislation undertaken independently. 3 Meanwhile, most other states have rejected the idea. 4 In any event, to examine the issue competently, an analyst needs to consider the arguments against same-sex marriage, which have been developed. Gallagher eventually began arguing that the negative effects of same-sex marriage would take a generation or more to be uncovered.

The most effective messages were arguments that allowing same-sex marriage would require schools to discuss same-sex marriage with students.

With the same-sex marriage law coming into effect with the first ceremonies in England and Wales on Saturday, who are those that oppose it and what are their reasons? Sometimes the debate on gay marriage has been polarised, casting those who supported the measure as the right-thinking and those who opposed it as irrational and guilty of tacit homophobia. The law to allow gay marriage passed quickly and there are those who still feel they have not had a proper chance to air their concerns.

There are religious people who oppose gay marriage primarily out of a fear that one day equality laws will force a church, mosque or temple to host a ceremony. Religious institutions have been protected from this scenario under the so-called "quadruple lock". The law will ensure no discrimination claim can be brought against religious organisations or individual ministers for refusing to marry a couple.

But there are some who just don't believe in the quadruple lock. These safeguards can get eroded and 10 years down the line they may not mean as much. There's also religious opposition about the redefinition of the traditional understanding of marriage. But there are not just religious objections to changing the definition of marriage. Not all marriages will result in children, he concedes, and also suggests that issues such as pension rules or inheritance may require the state to recognise alternative relationships in different ways.

But the same-sex marriage law is not about this, he says. That is both unnecessary and carries the risk of weakening the legal structure designed to encourage the attachment of children to their natural mother and father. Not every gay person is in favour of gay marriage. Some are against it. Historian David Starkey, has also said he is unconvinced. As an atheist gay who regards marriage as part of the baggage of heterosexual society which I have come to respect but can never fully share, I am tempted to say a plague on both your houses," he wrote in the Daily Telegraph in , external.

The historian David Starkey: "I'm torn on gay marriage". Actor Rupert Everett perhaps gave the most colourful argument against, in a interview in the Guardian. The wedding cake, the party, the champagne, the inevitable divorce two years later.

10 pros of same-sex marriage

It's just a waste of time in the heterosexual world, and in the homosexual world I find it personally beyond tragic that we want to ape this institution that is so clearly a disaster. There are some who argue that the difference between marriage and civil partnerships is primarily a semantic one. I relish that," Pierce said last year. Others say any remaining differences between civil partnerships and marriage could have been amended through existing legislation.

But he counters that he's in favour of the gay marriage law because it is a necessary symbolic and cultural step towards full equality. For some the main issue is the passage of the law itself. When the bill was discussed in the House of Lords, ex-chief constable Lord Dear tabled a "wrecking" amendment attempting to block its progress. In his view civil partnerships are too much like getting a driving licence and deserve a sense of dignity and occasion.

It was rushed through parliament with "indecent haste", he says, without a royal commission, an in-depth inquiry, or any mention in the manifesto. Correction: A quote by Fiona O'Reilly has been removed that implied that the Catholic Church for England and Wales accepted the passing of the law on civil partnerships, which, in fact, the church opposed.

Image source, Getty Images. The religious sceptic. The historical meaning case.